Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBilly, Romain Guillaumeen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMonnier, Louisen_GB
dc.contributor.authorNybakke, Evenen_GB
dc.contributor.authorIsaksen, Mortenen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Daniel Beaten_GB
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-20T13:04:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-28T13:12:50Z
dc.date.available2022-01-20T13:04:24Z
dc.date.available2022-01-28T13:12:50Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-22
dc.identifier.citationBilly, Monnier, Nybakke, Isaksen, Mueller. Systemic approaches for emission reduction in industrial plants based on physical accounting: example for an aluminium smelter . Environmental Science and Technology. 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12242/2972
dc.descriptionBilly, Romain Guillaume; Monnier, Louis; Nybakke, Even; Isaksen, Morten; Mueller, Daniel Beat. Systemic approaches for emission reduction in industrial plants based on physical accounting: example for an aluminium smelter. Environmental Science and Technology 2022en_GB
dc.description.abstractGreenhouse gas (GHG) accounting in industrial plants usually has multiple purposes, including mandatory reporting, shareholder and stakeholder communication, developing key performance indicators (KPIs), or informing cost-effective mitigation options. Current carbon accounting systems, such as the one required by the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS), ignore the system context in which emissions occur. This hampers the identification and evaluation of comprehensive mitigation strategies considering linkages between materials, energy, and emissions. Here, we propose a carbon accounting method based on multilevel material flow analysis (MFA), which aims at addressing this gap. Using a Norwegian primary aluminum production plant as an example, we analyzed the material stocks and flows within this plant for total mass flows of goods as well as substances such as aluminum and carbon. The results show that the MFA-based accounting (i) is more robust than conventional tools due to mass balance consistency and higher granularity, (ii) allows monitoring the performance of the company and defines meaningful KPIs, (iii) can be used as a basis for the EU ETS reporting and linked to internal reporting, (iv) enables the identification and evaluation of systemic solutions and resource efficiency strategies for reducing emissions, and (v) has the potential to save costs.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.relation.urihttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c05681
dc.subjectAluminiumen_GB
dc.subjectElektroderen_GB
dc.subjectAvfallen_GB
dc.titleSystemic approaches for emission reduction in industrial plants based on physical accounting: example for an aluminium smelteren_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.updated2022-01-20T13:04:24Z
dc.identifier.cristinID1984101
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.est.1c05681
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 237738
dc.source.issn0013-936X
dc.source.issn1520-5851
dc.type.documentJournal article
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Science and Technology


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record