Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoxnes, John Fredriken_GB
dc.contributor.authorFrøyland, Øyvinden_GB
dc.contributor.authorSkriudalen, Stianen_GB
dc.contributor.authorPrytz, Anne K.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorTeland, Jan Arilden_GB
dc.contributor.authorFriis, Evaen_GB
dc.contributor.authorØdegårdstuen, Garden_GB
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-06T11:36:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-07T06:41:13Z
dc.date.available2018-08-06T11:36:00Z
dc.date.available2018-08-07T06:41:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationMoxnes JF, Frøyland Ø, Skriudalen S, Prytz AK, Teland JA, Friis E, Ødegårdstuen G. On the study of ricochet and penetration in sand, water and gelatin by spheres, 7.62 mm APM2, and 25?mm projectiles. Defence Technology. 2016;12(2):159-170en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12242/867
dc.identifier.urihttps://ffi-publikasjoner.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/20.500.12242/867
dc.descriptionMoxnes, John Fredrik; Frøyland, Øyvind; Skriudalen, Stian; Prytz, Anne K.; Teland, Jan Arild; Friis, Eva; Ødegårdstuen, Gard. On the study of ricochet and penetration in sand, water and gelatin by spheres, 7.62 mm APM2, and 25?mm projectiles. Defence Technology 2016 ;Volum 12.(2) s. 159-170en_GB
dc.description.abstractWe examine the ricochet and penetration behavior in sand, water and gelatin by steel spheres, 7.62 mm APM2 and 25 mm projectiles. A threshold impact angle (critical angle) exists beyond which ricochet cannot occur. The Autodyn simulation code with the smooth particle hydrodynamic (SPH) method and Impetus Afea Solver with the corpuscular model are used and the results are compared with experimental and analytical results. The resistance force in sand for spheres was proportional to a term quadratic in velocity plus a term linear in velocity. The drag coefficient for the quadratic term was 0.65. The Autodyn and Impetus Afea codes simulate too large penetration due to the lack of a linear velocity resistance force. Critical ricochet angles were consistent with analytical results in the literature. In ballistic gelatin at velocities of 50–850 m/s a drag coefficient of 0.30 fits the high speed camera recordings if a linear velocity resistance term is included. However, only a quadratic velocity resistance force with drag coefficient that varies with the Reynolds number also fits the measurements. The simulation of a sphere in water with Autodyn showed too large drag coefficient. The 7.62 mm APM2 core simulations in sand fit reasonable well for both codes. The 25 mm projectile ricochet simulations in sand show consistency with the high speed camera recordings. Computer time was reduced by one to two orders of magnitudes when applying the Impetus Afea Solver compared to Autodyn code due to the use of the graphics processing units (GPU).en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.subjectTermSet Emneord::Prosjektiler
dc.subjectTermSet Emneord::Penetrasjon
dc.subjectTermSet Emneord::Rikosjett
dc.titleOn the study of ricochet and penetration in sand, water and gelatin by spheres, 7.62 mm APM2, and 25?mm projectilesen_GB
dc.title.alternativeOn the study of ricochet and penetration in sand, water and gelatin by spheres, 7.62 mm APM2, and 25?mm projectilesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.updated2018-08-06T11:36:00Z
dc.identifier.cristinID1581683
dc.identifier.cristinID1581683
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dt.2015.12.004
dc.source.issn2214-9147
dc.type.documentJournal article
dc.relation.journalDefence Technology


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record